Patent Law Practice Center

The Decline in Patent Contingency Litigation

There has been a steady decline in the number of contingency litigation law firms, attorneys, and even cases filed. This continues to greatly impact the intellectual property industry.

According to Paul Storm, a partner in Gardere’s Intellectual Property Practice, the decline in contingency representation over the last few years can be explained by weakened patents making success on the merits less likely. Even if the patent owner does prevail, what will they win? After a win at trial, the law of damages has made large damages less likely to achieve in the first place, and keep even if awarded. Read the rest of this entry »

AST acquires 70 patent assets in fixed-price, fixed-term buying program

AST, a provider of proactive patent risk mitigation solutions, recently announced the results from IP3 2017, a fixed-price, fixed-term, collaborative patent-buying program. Launched this past August, IP3 2017 gave sellers an easy way to access the secondary market by streamlining the process of selling patents with a fixed-price, rapid-response model. Through IP3 2017, patent sellers had the opportunity to offer their patents for purchase to AST’s full membership, which includes dozens of the world’s most successful companies across multiple industries.

Like the inaugural IP3, IP3 2017 attracted strong interest from both patent sellers and AST members. Participants in IP3 2017 included 15 operating companies including Google, IBM, Microsoft, Ford, Honda, and Cisco with nearly $2.5 million spent to acquire 70 active assets.

Unlike IP3 2016, which was open to AST and non-AST Members and sought patent submissions across all technologies, IP3 2017 was a narrower program and sought submissions limited to the following technologies: (1) Internet of Things, (2) Wireless, (3) Content Delivery, (4) Networking, and (5) Communications.

Read the rest of this entry »

U.S. Argues Patents are a Public Right in Oil States

In going through the Department of Justice brief in Oil States, you will find no fewer than seven different places where the government makes the argument that patents are a public right, and not private property as they are ordinarily considered. This is interesting because the patent statute itself refers to patents as having all the same attributes of personal property, and at various times the Supreme Court has themselves equated patents to real estate.

Notwithstanding, the Federal Government argues patents are a public right throughout its Oil States brief, as shown from the passages that follow:

DOJ Oil States brief at pg. 13

The justification for patents is not that an inventor has a natural right to preclude others from making or using his invention, but that patent protection will ultimately benefit the public by providing an incentive to innovate. Governmentally-conferred franchises designed to serve such purposes create “public rights,” whose scope and continuing effectiveness may be resolved by non-Article III tribunals.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jury finds Corel willfully infringed Microsoft Office patents

A jury from the Northern District of California recently awarded Microsoft Corporation a total of $278,000 in a patent infringement action against Corel Corporation and Corel, Inc. (collectively “Corel”). See Microsoft Corporation v. Corel Corporation et al (Case: 5:15-cv-05836-EJD). Microsoft had requested more than $1 million in damages for the infringement of patents related to Microsoft Office (i.e., the Microsoft Office patents).

Microsoft sued Corel in December 2015, asserting infringement of nine patents — 5 utility patents and four design patents. By the time the case was submitted to the jury on Friday, February 9, 2018, only six patents remained in the case…two utility patents and four design patents.

Microsoft argued that Corel willfully infringed those patents. The asserted Microsoft patents are directed to graphic user interfaces used in Microsoft products, such as Microsoft Office. Microsoft asserted that it has given its interfaces, including menus and toolbars, a distinctive look and feel, which Corel copied into the accused products, including WordPerfect X7. WordPerfect X7 even includes an option to use the product in the “Microsoft Word mode.” See Complaint para 3-5. Similarly, Quatro Pro X7 offers the option to use the product in the “Microsoft Excel mode.” See Complaint para. 6-8.

In the jury verdict form returned, the jury unanimously agreed that Corel had willfully infringed those patents. Read the rest of this entry »

Uber to Pay Waymo $245 million to Settle Dispute

Alphabet subsidiary Waymo settled with Uber in the midst of a trade secret infringement trial. This lawsuit originated when Waymo brought suit against Uber in 2017, alleging that former Waymo engineer Anthony Levandowski, who was hired by Uber to lead Uber’s self-driving car project, took with him thousands of confidential documents.

Uber will reportedly pay $245 million in shares to Waymo in order to settle the case, a settlement that took place just prior to the start of the fifth day of testimony.

“While we do not believe that any trade secrets made their way from Waymo to Uber, nor do we believe that Uber has used any of Waymo’s proprietary information in its self-driving technology, we are taking steps with Waymo to ensure our Lidar and software represents just our good work,” Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said in a statement.

Read the rest of this entry »