Patent Law Practice Center

Emotion And Anecdotes Should Not Drive Patent Policy Debate

Written by Gene Quinn (Founder of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor)

Emotion and anecdotes unfortunately drive the debate on IP policy, particularly patent policy, because most people are suspicious and predisposed against monopolies. That is certainly understandable, at least in a vacuum. Who among us likes monopolies? Monopolies charge super competitive prices and consumers have no leverage, which leads frequently to inferior goods or services that consumers are forced to accept. This aversion to monopolies has been ingrained in American culture and heritage since the founding of the Nation, and was taken to new extremes during President Theodore Roosevelt’s Administration. Roosevelt stood up for the little guy and became known as a trust buster, what today we might refer to as a monopoly killer.

Unfortunately for those who seek to leverage the appropriate suspicion against monopolies, a patent is not a monopoly. A patent does confer exclusive rights, but as every inventor knows the fact that you have a patent does not guarantee that anyone will be interested in the good or service associated with the patent grant. Without interest there is no market, without a market there can be no monopoly. So patents are not equivalent to creating a monopoly.

Read the rest of the article at IPWathchdog.com.

USPTO Proposes Three-Track Patent Examination System

On June 4, 2010, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published in the Federal Register a detailed call for comments and the announcement of a public meeting to discuss it’s proposed Three-Track patent processing initiative. Federal Register/ Vol.75, No 71/Friday, June 4, 2010/ notes.  The public meeting will take place at the USPTO office on July 20, 2010.

Under the proposed initiative, for applications filed first in the United States, an applicant may: (1) Request prioritized examination (Track I); (2) for non-continuing applications, request  a delay lasting up to 30 months in docketing for examination (Track III); or (3) obtain processing under the current procedure (Track II) by not requesting either (1) or (2).  As for applications filed in the USPTO that are based on a prior foreign-filed application, the proposed process is quite different.

According to  Jack O’Brien, founder of Law Offices of John A. O’Brien P.C. and Practice Center Contributor,  “All applications filed first in the United States can freely participate this three track system.  However, US patent applications based on a prior foreign filed application are delayed.” (more…)